therefore can't it's the 50,000 possible

[roy sandy]

therefore can't it's the 50,000 possible values for X right there's a to the 50,000 possibledetectors the life 50,000 on as hell you know one way to mall others is amultinomial distribution but because it is the 50,000 possiblevalues for axe I would need you know to the 50,000 likemaybe -1 parameters was set to some to wonder it's -1 arm and this i 70-413 s clearly way too manypromises to model using a multinomialdistribution over overall to 50,000 possibilitiescell in a naive Bayes algorithm me to make a very strong assumption onPFX given why on then in particular I'm going to seeyou them just say was .

http://www.testkiz.com/exam-70-413