Crazy Little Bets - Money Makes Money

[sagasan]

If you happen to be in an Internet marketing workshop, chances are you have gone through the part about identifying market niche. Usually, this is where you are asked to look up for some keywords online using tools to evaluate the market demand represented by those keywords. This is no doubt an effective approach. Not only it is one of the fastest ways to identify an online niche market, it is Crazy Little Bets Review also the perfect way to deliver a result-oriented lesson in a classroom setting. Unfortunately, majority of us do not get the niche market identification right the first time. In the interest of completing a workshop, many of those who teach this particular topic have neglected to explain a hidden thought process we share. Basically, you are assumed to already have a starting point or an idea when running those searches. In other words, you are expected to have at least a broad keyword in mind that defines the industry that interests you.

But what if you do not know your market of interest and your are actually clueless of how to get one right? The foremost advantage is that updates from the server arrive only for the part of the page requested by the client. It's also good that widgets are separated functionally. A particular widget is in charge of a part of the page; changes in a part will not affect the whole page. Responsiveness/Usability: 3/5. The volume of transferred data for a part of a page is smaller than for the whole page, that's why responsiveness is higher. But since a page is a set of widgets, the applicable UI templates in a web application are limited by the chosen UI framework. Cold start (the first full loading) of such a page will take a little longer. The content, which is fully generated and cached on the server, can be instantly displayed on the client; here time is spent on getting the data for the widget and, as a rule, on templating.

At the first visit the website will not be that quick to load, but further it will be much more pleasant in use, if compared to sites based on the architecture of the first type. Also it's worth to mention the possibility of implementation of ''partial'' loading (like it's done on yahoo.com). Crazy Little Bets Linkability: 2/5. Here special tools and mechanisms are needed. As a rule, Hash-Bang mechanism is applied. SEO: 2/5. There are special mechanisms for these tasks. For example, for promotion of websites based on this architecture it's possible to predefine the list of promoted pages and make static URLs for them, without parameters and modificators. Speed of development: 3/5. Not only does one need to know the server-side technologies, but also to use JavaScript frameworks on the client side. It's also required to implement web services on the server side.

Performance: 4/5. The time and resources, spent on generation of HTML-content, are relatively minor if compared to the time spent by the app on retrieving data from the databases, and on their processing before templating. Use of the extended type of this architecture (when data are transferred as JSON) lowers the traffic between the client and the server, but adds an abstraction level to the application: retrieval from database -> data processing, serialization in JSON -> API: JSON -> parsing of JSON -> binding of data object on the client to HTML. Offline work: 1/5. The manifest mechanism works in this case, but there's a problem with updating or caching the data displayed on the widget. This functionality has to be implemented additionally: in the manifest can be indicated only names of the files which will be cached from the server. Correlation between the widget template file, cached in the manifest, and logic of page behavior requires extra labor efforts.

http://innertradingcirclereviews.co/100m-dollar-club-system-review/