The Erectile Dysfunction Remedy Report

[M GRACESARAH]

http://nytransguide.org/the-erectile-dysfunction-remedy-report-syst... That backlash is bad enough on its own. But to consign millions of future people to preventable suffering and death, or to watch their children inherit diseases that could have been prevented, is the exact opposite of ethics. It's cruelty of staggering proportions.Might someone alter their genetic endowment in destructive ways, or for trivial or arguably improper motives? Surely. No technology ever invented has been free of abuse or misuse.

The Erectile Dysfunction Remedy Report Should we outlaw wheels because they can be used by invading armies? Ban cosmetic surgery because people should wear the noses and cheekbones with which they were born? Eliminate cars to prevent motor vehicle deaths?The sort of genetic manipulation that could stop hereditary Alzheimer's is years away from implementation, and much further than that from being available to a casual non-medical user. Just because we have the ability to change DNA doesn't mean we know yet exactly what to change and how to change it.

http://gofishtalk.com/profiles/blogs/the-erectile-dysfunction-remed...

There is room for regulation over what sort of uses will eventually be made available and how they will be administered and funded.There is no room at all, however, for the argument that a scientific advancement that could bring so much comfort to so many people should be banned altogether because of some misplaced fear of "playing God." Our genetic endowments belong to us, not to the self-appointed "ethicists" who would tell us what we can do with them.