ry Rangers Mike Gartner Jersey , you may

IRVING Adam Graves Jersey , Texas -- After what ourred last year in the draft, munication was clearly lking in the Cowboys' war room. There was a split as to what to do with Sharrif Floyd, a defensive tkle from Florida, who beca available in the middle rounds.It seed the scouts liked Floyd, but defensive line coh Rod Marinelli did not. So after a discussion, the Cowboys moved on, trading down in the first round and eventually selecting Travis Frederick, a center from Wisconsin.It was a solid choice, but the process to getting there was flawed. The Cowboys made so changes in the war room, allowing assistant director of player personnel Will McClay to put the draft board together and taking so pressure off Tom Ciskowski, the director of scouting.McClay, with the help of Ciskowski, implented a pod system where cohes and scouts gather to discuss several players and then e to an agreent regarding the evaluation.The objective it to minimize debates during the draft about players and to ease the burden on Jerry Jones, the general manager Rod Gilbert Jersey , who makes the final call on all personnel decisions. Jones makes his decisions based on what the cohes and scouts say.McClay's goal is to make sure the scouts and cohes are on the sa page before rending a pick to Jones.Thursday night, the only debating going on was whether or not the Cowboys ould trade out of the No. 16 pick and telling Stephen Jones, the executive vice president, which button to pu on the phone when the calls ca in.The Cowboys selected Notre Da tkle Zk Martin with little debate in the war room."Ultimately [Jerry Jones] makes the call on who we're choosing as a football team," coh Jason Garrett said. "But the process that we go through with Will McClay and Tom Ciskowski and all of our scouts and all of our cohes, it's really a thorough process and that munication was outstanding."As the Cowboys were discussing the Martin selection, Garrett spoke with passing ga coordinator Scott Linehan. And with three other defensive players the Cowboys liked off the board, defensive coordinator Marinelli was also involved in the discussion.It made for an easy first night of the draft for the Cowboys."We had targeted players, so of those players were gone," Garrett said. "Martin was a guy that we really liked. If we were going to sit there and pick, he was certainly one of the guys ecstatic to be able choose for our football team. It was almost reaffirming so of the conversations that we had had over the last few weeks and certainly over the last few days."The problem is that such impulsive tendencies appear to have entered the domain of relationships. People are now talking about instant coffee, instant popcorn, instant pizza, and even instant marriage with the same ease. With instant marriages Ron Greschner Jersey , the prospect of an instant divorce also looms ominously. But don锟絫 think you锟絩e rid of your newly wed wife just yet. This is where stringent divorce laws enter the picture; to prevent society and the family as an institution from disintegrating like a bone china cup in one slip. Every leader has a duty to set a path for the public without worrying about intruding into personal choices. After all, is wearing a seatbelt not a rule? Can it ever be a matter of personal choice? Similarly, preserving marriages as the fabric of society should also become a focus. Historical Perspective on Marriage and Divorce During Roman times, marriage and family affairs came within the ambit of comprehensive state laws. As the Roman Catholic Church gained prominence, it took a tough stand against divorce. This succeeded to a great extent in preserving the institution of family and marriage. During the 1500s, the Protestant Reformation in Europe supported the secularization of marriage and divorce laws. In England, the Anglican Church toed a line that was somewhat akin to that of the Catholic Church and managed to secure the sanctity of marriage in British society. Between 1669 and 1850, only 229 divorces were granted in England. The Contemporary Situation At present, the plight of cardinal social institutions like marriage and the family is so precarious and vague, thanks to our liberal divorce laws. Though law is not a monolithic entity and is open to change and reform under social pressure and needs, this does not warrant a loose attitude toward divorce. Mass perception and opinion is influenced by the nature of existing divorce laws in society. If the divorce laws are tough, people give due respect and consideration to their marital vows. Vice versa, a soft attitude towards divorce makes marriage a flimsy arrangement susceptible to subjective considerations, which can be discarded any time. Hence it is imperative that divorce laws should be made tougher to bolster the institution of marriage in contemporary Britain. A high divorce rate is not only harmful for individual families Brian Leetch Jersey , but has a wider impact on the entire social fabric. At present, every third marriage is ending in a divorce, influencing trends like teen pregnancies, the number of children born out of wedlock, crime rates and instances of cohabitation. If this trend is allowed to proceed unhampered, fifty years from now, British society will undergo a transformation that will not be to the liking of responsible and concerned citizens. Scared and deprived by parental divorce, children just out of their diapers are proceeding to become parents. Women and children are being forced into a life marred by financial constraints and emotional insecurity. Marriage is Still Popular No matter what you say or think, marriage still happens to be the most popular social institution, the world over. Even those who swear by the merits of divorce choose to remarry yet again. Individuals should not allow themselves to be misled by the shallow logic of divorce attorneys, who are often more concerned about settling the legal technicalities like custody, alimony, division of assets and off course their fees in .